Blog | RSS | Photo Gallery | Wish List     Eric's Blob
Around the Horn Posted at 13:39 by Eric

Yet again, it's been an obnoxiously long time since I've posted a durn thing. I've actually had some really cool things going on though, and I look forward to writing about them soon. Until then, a few other things (some of which are provacative :-)

  • First, I've recently taken a liking to speadable cheese. That, and Ritz crackers. Yummy :-)
  • I think the idea that people from any country can come into ours illegally, have children, and expect for them to be fully cared for and schooled is nuts. Making the matter worse is that our ability to guard the borders is provably weak, and money set aside to help with that has been shuffled elsewhere.

    It looks like some folks are finally getting brave enough to stand up and do something about it. Even much of Europe, who most Americans seem to adore (it's not just a mattress, it's a European mattress!), has done away with the birthright citizen policy :-)

  • Right now in the medical community, there is an ethics policy regarding organ donors. There is a list you are on, and you have the right to an organ donation purely based on how long you've been on the list. Nothing else matters... age, sex, what you do in life, how much you make. It's just about the list.

    Organ donations typically occur when someone dies. The big exception to that is that a family member is allowed to donate to someone in the family, regardless of ones place on the list.

    Here's where things get hairy... there's a new website, matchingdonors.com, which is setup for people who need organs to make their case for receiving an organ now, from a live donor, regardless of their place on the list.

    So, if you need a kidney, you go on that site, tell the world about yourself, and hope someone decides to give you one. The thing is that it's been working... and right now, there are some 2500 people signed up to be able to give organs as a live donor. But the medical community isn't sure how to take this, it bypasses their existing ethics system, sort of.

    It's hard to get a good take on the matter. I can appreciate the idea that there's an ethical issue with putting a value on someones head. At the same time, there's never before been a time where so many people have been willing to part with an organ, and they're willing to do so because they get to pick and choose who they feel they relate with, or who they would want to help.

    Without this site, these live donors would not be donating. Many of the people they've donated to would be dead by now without their help, those people were too far down on the list to be helped by the existing system.

    What do you think?

  • And lastly, I just thought I'd mention that I have a good bit of my Christmas shopping finished already :-) And coming soon will be the 2005 Christmas Price Index.
| |

     Posted at Fri Nov 4 18:49:51 2005 by Don Spidell
The one part of the current organ donation system I don't like is that a life-long drunk who's zapped his liver could be higher up on the list than someone who's liver just wore out too soon. A website like matchingdonors.com seems to fix that, though I guess you could always lie about being a raging alcoholic.

     Posted at Fri Nov 4 19:11:29 2005 by Eric Andreychek
Very true, they could lie. Though, you can meet the people first, which could at least offer some kind of impression of themselves in addition to what they wrote.

Not true      Posted at Sat Nov 5 16:16:37 2005 by Nathan Powell
That is a falsehood that a life long drunk can get a liver before someone else. In fact my uncle, a life long "drunk" as don put it, was denied a place on the list _at all_ because of his problems with alcohol. One can not lie about how they got cirrhosis, as the abuse of alcohol has other lasting effects that can not be masked at that level. Now do I think he should have been allowed on the list. No I don't. Not because I didn't love him, I did, but because his disease was so bad that a new liver would not have stood a chance. And a new liver is not the same as starting over. You will likely be in a diminished state health wise, have to take anti-rejection medicine for life and probably not live to a full life expectancy anyway. So in the end I am glad he was not given a liver (and truth be told he didn't try after he was rejected, as he knew he would not be able to stop drinking). So before you tear off on some righteous quest to blast "life long drunks" consider that perhaps, just maybe, they felt powerless in the face of alcohol and that that type of judgement is...shall we say, uncharitable. As for the brokeness of the existing system...I am not sure. What criteria do we use. Meaning...so your mother is at the top of the list, and my mother is at the bottom...who is more deserving. It indeed does seem to be an arbitrary decsion, however I am not sure of another way to go about it. The list, at least it appears to me, is a way to determine severity and how long the person has been in need. I am a little concerned about the criteria you listed there eric. I am sure you didn't mean that "age, sex, what you do in life, how much you make" should be the way we determine someones place on the list? We are friends (meaning I have some idea of the things you believe in) so it seems likely that you were just listing a few characteristics of persons. At least I hope you were :) (though perhaps age would be a good quantifier, I mean a 95 y/o v 5 y/o...who would argue with that, cept maybe the 95 y/o :)

     Posted at Mon Nov 7 14:12:02 2005 by Don Spidell
Ok, strike my last comment from the record. I should have researched better how the organ donation list works. And I didn't sound too compassionate.


Post a Comment
    Name:
    URL/Email: [http://... or mailto:you@wherever] (optional)
    Title: (optional)
    Comments:
      Use HTML for formatting. Allowed HTML: <a> <p> <b> <i> <u> <hr> <br> <ol> <ul> <li>

trackback

TrackBack ping me at:

http://www.openthought.org/blosxom.cgi/Blog/General/nov_2005_notes.trackback